Kotter#5,6 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Kotter5,6 - Essay ExampleIn this step, Kotter (4-12) emphasizes to delegate the powers, authority and autonomy to direct the transplant efforts in order to reshape a new behavior, replacing the old behavior. On the other hand, Haddad (98-99) has center more on feasibility, effectiveness and benefits of participatory design while implementing a strategic change. If company is promote from those who are directly going to be affected by change implementation, that change program result fulfill their needs more appropriately rather than implementing such a change in which employees company is overlooked. This bottom lime strategy clearly resembles with that of fifth step of Kotter (4-12) which puts more weight on empowering others to piece in the vision.I agree with points raised by Kegan and Lahey (49-59) to understand the concept why pack wont change, simply because of the 180-degree difference in their stated commitments and competing commitments. However, if these behaviors ar e identified and appropriately confronted with the participation of employees, the implementation of strategic change will be far more convenient for the organizations.The analysis of Beer and Nohria (13-23) outlines the deuce mindsets of managers in dealing with the change. These mindsets are formulated as Theory E and Theory O by Beer and Nohria (13-23). Those managers who have the mindset of Theory E, investigates the Economic value of everything which they find in the organizations culture. These managers stab hard to maximize the wealth of shareholder as their ultimate goal of success. On the contrary, Theory O believers have the standpoint of developing the capabilities of the organization. If the combined effects of both these theories are analyzed, these effects are closely related to the sixth step of Kotter (4-12) which involves short-tem wins.